Relapsed or Resistant Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatment

Authored by Natalia Gandur, published on 2026-10-08 11:14:43.0

  1. Assess response milestones (BCR::ABL1 IS)
    Assess the BCR::ABL1 molecular response trajectory and determine whether there is an inadequate response or loss of a previously achieved response. Key molecular response milestones: 3 months: BCR::ABL1 IS ≤10% is favorable; >10% is a warning and becomes unfavorable if confirmed within 1–3 months. 6 months: ≤1% is favorable; >1–10% is a warning; >10% represents established resistance. 12 months: ≤0.1% is favorable; >0.1–1% is a warning; >1% is unfavorable. At any time: loss of a previous response, a resistant BCR::ABL1 mutation, or high-risk additional cytogenetic abnormalities should raise concern for resistance. Do not base a treatment switch on a single unexpected PCR result alone. Review the molecular trajectory together with adherence, dose interruptions or reductions, drug interactions, comorbidities, and potential laboratory variability.
    • Rule out pseudo-resistance
      Before confirming true TKI resistance, reassess potentially reversible causes of an inadequate molecular response: Non-adherence Drug–drug interactions Dose interruptions or dose reductions Laboratory / assay variability If the molecular trajectory is unexpected, repeat or confirm BCR::ABL1 testing as clinically appropriate before declaring true resistance. Address reversible causes whenever possible before changing therapy.
      • Mutation testing (NGS preferred)
        Perform BCR::ABL1 kinase-domain mutation testing when TKI resistance is suspected or when a persistent warning or unfavorable molecular response is present. Targeted BCR::ABL1 NGS is preferred when available because it provides greater sensitivity for detecting emerging resistant clones. Use the mutation profile to: identify TKIs that are unlikely to be effective; guide selection of the next TKI; identify T315I or other clinically relevant resistance-associated mutations. Consider conventional cytogenetic analysis when resistance is suspected to assess for additional chromosomal abnormalities or disease progression.
        • Select next TKI
          Select the next TKI according to: prior TKI exposure; BCR::ABL1 mutation profile; prior intolerance versus true resistance; comorbidities and drug-specific toxicity; treatment goals and patient preference. After imatinib failure Consider a second-generation TKI or asciminib, guided by mutation profile and comorbidities. After resistance to a second-generation TKI Consider asciminib or ponatinib, when clinically appropriate. T315I mutation Ponatinib or asciminib Multi-TKI-resistant disease or resistance to ponatinib or asciminib Refer for allo-HCT evaluation Consider a clinical trial when available. Key principle: unfavorable response reflects inadequate depth or loss of response → reassess exposure and adherence, test for resistance mutations, and change therapy when appropriate.
tosprivacyApperley JF, Milojkovic D, Cross NCP, et al. 2025 European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2025;39(8):1797-1813. doi:10.1038/s41375-025-02664-w.Cross NCP, Ernst T, Branford S, et al. European LeukemiaNet laboratory recommendations for the diagnosis and management of chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2023;37:2150-2167. doi:10.1038/s41375-023-02048-y.Hochhaus A, Réa D, Boquimpani C, et al. Asciminib vs bosutinib in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia previously treated with at least two tyrosine kinase inhibitors: longer-term follow-up of ASCEMBL. Leukemia. 2023;37(3):617-626. doi:10.1038/s41375-023-01829-9.Cortes J, Apperley J, Lomaia E, et al. Ponatinib dose-ranging study in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a randomized, open-label phase 2 clinical trial. Blood. 2021;138(21):2042-2050. doi:10.1182/blood.2021012082.